ETANOL, MILHO E FRANGO: A INTERDEPENDENCIA DE SUAS CADEIAS GLOBAIS

E. M. Ferragi; I.A. Naas

doi:10.18011/bioeng2015v9n1p01-10

Authors

E. M. Ferragi
I.A. Naas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2015v9n1p01-10

Keywords:

interrelated supply chains, energy production, feed production

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the impact of the increase in the United States (US) ethanol production from corn, between 2000 and 2012, and extendedly in the broiler production. A comparative production analysis of the three commodities production in the US and Brazil was given in order to understand the effect on their supply chains. Results indicated that the increase in the US ethanol production was not followed by the local corn and broiler production. Reflexes of the increase in US ethanol production were found in Brazilian broiler production since the corn supply was historically dependent of the US supply. We have also found an excellent opportunity for Brazilian corn production increase with a direct result in ethanol and broiler production since further logistics, and infrastructure solutions are given.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE PROTEÍNA ANIMAL – ABPA. Relatório Anual. Technical report. 2013.

BANERJEE, A. Food, Feed, Fuel: Transforming the competition for grains. Development and Change, v. 42, p. 529–557, 2011.

BRASIL - Tribunal de Contas da União. Mercado interno de etanol. Tribunal de Contas da União. Relator Ministro Raimundo Carreiro – Brasília: TCU. 2012.

COMPANHIA NACIONAL DE ABASTECIMENTO - CONAB. Acompanhamento de safra brasileira : cana-de-açúcar, quarto levantamento, abril/2013 – Brasília. Technical report. 2013.

EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA - EMBRAPA. Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. Sistema de Produção 1. 8ª edição. Versão Eletrônica. 2012. http://sistemasdeproducao.cnptia.embrapa.br/FontesHTML/Milho/CultivodoMilho_8ed/economia.htm 2012.

FABIOSA, J.F. The long-run impacts of ethanol subsidies and ethanol expansion on the US corn and pig sectors. EuroChoices ©. The Agricultural Economics Society and the European Association of Agricultural Economists, v. 11, p. 29-35, 2012.

FARINA, E.; RODRIGUES, L.; SOUZA, E.L. A política de petróleo e a indústria de etanol no Brasil. Interesse Nacional. Julho/Setembro, p.64-75, 2013.

FARRELL, A.E.; PLEVIN, R.J.; TUMER, B.T.; JONES, A.D.; O'HARE, M.; KAMMEN, D.M. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science, v. 311, p. 506-508. 2006.

FIGUEIRA, S.R.; BURNQUIST, H.L. Programas para álcool combustível nos Estados Unidos e possibilidades de Exportação do Brasil. Agric. São Paulo, v. 53, p. 5-18, 2006.

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS - FAO. Food Outlook, Biannual Report on Global Food Markets. Technical report. June 2013.

GEREFFI, G. The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How U.S. Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks. In Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, edited by G. Gereffi and M. Korzeniewics. Westport: Praeger. Pp 95-123. 1994.

JACKSON, P.; WARD, N.; RUSSELL, P. Mobilising the commodity chain concept in the politics of food and farming. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 22, p.129 – 141, 2006.

KLOPFENSTEIN,T.J.; ERICKSONA, G.E.; BERGERB, L.L.Maize is a critically important source of food, feed, energy and forage in the USA. Field Crops Research, v. 153, 5-11, 2013.

MARQUES, D.S.P.; PAULILLO, L.F.O.; VIAN, C.E.F. Ethanol tranding groups and network governance. Gestão & Produção, v. 19, n. 4, pp. 825-840, 2012.

MEYER, P.M.; RODRIGUES, P.H.M.; MILLEN, D.D. Impact of biofuel production in Brazil on the economy, agriculture, and the environment. Animal Frontiers – The review magazine of animal agriculture, v. 3, p28-37, 2013.

MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO - MAPA. Relação das unidades produtoras cadastradas no Departamento da Cana-de-açúcar e Agroenergia. Sistema de Acompanhamento da Produção Canavieira. Departamento de Cana-de-açúcar e agroenergia. 2012. http://www.agricultura.gov.br/arq_editor/file/Desenvolvimento_Sustentavel/Agroenergia/Orientacoes_Tecnicas/Usinas%20e%20Destilarias%20Cadastradas/DADOS_PRODUTORES_22-10-2012.pdf .

MUHAMMAD, A.; WHITTINGTON, A.; ANDERSON, J.; HERNDON, C. The impact of feed cost in U.S. poultry production: Implications for the impact of increased ethanol production. In: Bio-Fuels, Food and Feed Tradeoffs Conference. 2007.

NATIONAL CHICKEN COUNCIL - NCC. Broiler Chicken Industry Key Facts. 2011. http://www.nationalchickencouncil.org/about-the-industry/statistics/broiler-chicken-industry-key-facts/

OXFAM INTERNATIONAL. Cereal Secrets - The world's largest grain traders and global agriculture. Oxfam Research Reports. August 2012.

PIMENTEL, D.; MARKLEIN, A.; TOTH, M.A.; KARPOFF, M.; PAIL, G.S.; MCCOMACK, R.; KYRIAZIS, J.; KRUEGER, T. Review - Biofuel impacts on world food supply: Use of fossil fuel, land and water resources. Energies, v. 1, p.41-78, 2008.

RENEWABLE FUELS ASSOCIATION - RFA . Acelerating Industry Innovation – 2012. Ethanol Industry Outlook. 2012.

Ethanol Facts: Agriculture - Feeding the World, Fueling a Nation. 2014. http://www.ethanolrfa.org/pages/ethanol-facts-agriculture.

Historic U.S. fuel Ethanol Production. 2013. http://ethanolrfa.org/pages/statistics#A.

ROSILLO-CALLE, F.; WALTER, A.Global market for bioethanol: historical trends and future prospects. Energy for Sustainable Development.v.10, n.1, pp 20-32. 2006.

SANTOS, R.B.N.; AMORIM, A.L.; CORONEL, D.A.; SANTOS, F.T.P. Relações de co-integração entre preço dos biocombustíveis e alimentos: Comparativo entre o etanol americano e a produção de milho no Brasil. 48º Congresso SOBER - Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administração e Sociologia Rural. 2010.

SCHEMER, M.R.; VOGEL, K.P.; MITCHELL, R.B.; PERRIN, R.K. Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 105, p. 464-469. 2007.

SILVA, T.; VERGES, P.; ORLOVICIN, N.; POMENTA, R.Etanol de Milho no Brasil – Viabilidade de Produção. Commodity Insight. INTL FCStone. Technical Report. 2014.

SORDA, G.; BANSE, M.; KEMFERT, C. An overview of biofuel policies across the world. Energy Policy, v. 38, p.6977 – 6988, 2010.

SUN, Y.; CHENG, J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresource Technology, v. 8, p.1–11, 2002.

TALBOT, J.M. The comparative advantages of tropical commodity chain analysis. In Jennifer Bair. (ed.) Frontiers of commodity chain research. Stanford University Press. California. 2009.

TIMILSINA, G.R.; BEGHIN, J.C.; MENSBRUGGHE, D.; MEVEL, S. The impacts of biofuels targets on land-use change and food supply: A global CGE assessment. Agricultural Economics, v. 43, p.315–332, 2012.

TIMILSINA, G.R.; MEVEL, S.; SHRESTHA, A. Oil price, biofuels and food supply. Energy Policy, v. 39, p. 8098 –8105, 2011.

VALOR ECONÔMICO. Demanda para a produção de rações deve pressionar cotação do milho. 2012. http://www.valor.com.br/agro/2532744/demanda-para-producao-de-racoes-deve-pressionar-cotacao-do-milho#ixzz3GWRLHeMR.

WATT GLOBAL MEDIA - Poultry International Magazine. The world's leading broiler producers. 2014. http://www.wattagnet.com/Worldtoppoultry/world_broiler_producers.html

WILKINSON, J. 2009. Globalization of Agribusiness and Developing World Food Systems. Monthlyreview.org. 2009. http://monthlyreview.org/2009/09/01/globalization-of-agribusiness-and-developingworld-food-systems

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – WEF. Energy transitions: Past and Future. Energy Vision 2013. Technical Report. 2013.