ELECTRONIC MONITORING ON BEHAVIORAL PATTERNS OF DAIRY COWS IN A COOLING FREE STALL
Keywords:Evaporative cooling, resting area, behaviour, dairy cows
This research aimed to use electronic monitoring for evaluating behavior patterns oflactating cows in a cooling free stall. Four video cameras were strategically installed ineach treatment for capturing in real time images of animal displac ements and activities,as intake, rumination and resting. The trial was carried out during 28 consecutive days of November 2003, in which images were daily recorded from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. during 7days. Fifteen multiparous lactating cows producing 20 kg of milk per day were used. The tested treatments were: non-fan (F0), fan (F) and fan plus misting (FM) in direction to animal bedding. Dry bulb temperature (DBT) and air relative humidity (RH) inside and outside of facility were measured every 15 minutes during 24 hours. The RH was higher in non-fan (61.8%) and fan plus misting (61.8%) treatments than in fan (60.3%) treatment. Also, the temperature and humidity index was higher in fan (75.0) treatment than in non-fan (74.5) and fan plus misting (74.3) treatments. In the treatment with fan, animals spent more time in the feeding area (108.3 min) than those of non-fan (60.7 min) and fan plus misting (72.5 min) treatments. Fan treatment cows spent more time (19.3 min) in waterers in relation to non-fan (8.3 min). Different patterns were observed in the cow’s preference relative to resting area. The resting areas include the bedding adjacent to feeding area and bedding adjacent to waterers. Cows of non-fan (189.0 min) and fan(167.3 min) spent more time lying in the bedding adjacent to feeding area. However, the cows of treatment fan plus misting (164.0 min of total) spent more time lying in the bedding adjacent to waterers in relation fan (26.7 min). The cows of fan plus misting treatment also spent more time (35.0 min) standing in passage area (drinkers) than of non-fan and fan (10.0 min). In the current experiment, the results indicate difference infree stall occupancy. The cow’s preference was always related to the availability of cooling system.
BACCARI, J.R., Manejo ambiental da vaca leiteira em climas quentes. Londrina:UEL, 2001. 142p
BOWLER, P. J. The environmental sciences. New York: W.W Norton and Company, 1993. 315p.
CALEGARI, F.; CALAMARI, L.; FARZZI, E. Effects of ventilation and misting on behavior of dairy cattle in the hot season in south Italy. In: INTERNATIONAL DAIRY HOUSING CONFERENCE, 5. Texas, 2003. Proceedings. Texas: American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2003. p. 303-311.
CAMPOS, A.T. A importância da água parao gado de leite. Embrapa Gado de Leite. Disponível em: <http://www.sbz.org.br>. Acesso em 20 de mar. de 2003.
CURTIS, S. E. Environment managementin animal agriculture. Illinois: Animal Environment Services, 1981.430 p.
FURLAN, R.A. Avaliação da nebulização e abertura de cortinas na redução da temperatura do ar emambiente protegido. Piracicaba, 2001.146 p. Tese (Doutorado)- Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo.
GAWORSKI, M. A.; TUCKER, C. B.; WEARY, D.M.. Effects of stall design on dairy cattle behaviour. (Compact disc). In:INTERNATIONAL DAIRY HOUSING CONFERENCE, 5., Fort Worth, 2003.Proceedings.Fort Worth: American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2003.
GIBBONS, J.D. Non parametric methods for quantitativea analysis. New York: Holt, 1976. 254p.
KROHN, C.C.; MUNKSGAARD, L. Behaviour of cows kept in extensive (loosehousing/pasture) or intensive (tiestall) environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.37, p1-6, 1993.
MATARAZZO, S. V.; PERISSINOTTO, M.; SILVA, I. J.O.; MOURA, D. J.; FERNANDES, S.A.A. Thermal conditioned inresting area of freestall facilities and its consequences on productive and physiological responses in dairy cows. Paper054020. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2005.
NOETHER, G. E. Introduction to statistics: the nonparametric way. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
OVERTON, M. W.; SISCHO, W.M.; TEMPLE, G.D. Using time-lapse video photography to assess dairy cattle lying behavior in freestall barn. Journal of Dairy Science, Savoy, IL. v.85, p.2407-2413, 2002.
PIRES, M.F.A.; VILELA, D.; VERNEQUE, R.S.; TEODORO, R.L Reflexos do estresse térmico no comportamento das vacas em lactação. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE AMBIÊNCIA NA PRODUÇÃO DE LEITE, 1.,Piracicaba, 1998. Anais... Piracicaba:FEALQ, 1998. p.68-102.
PIRES, M. F. A.; TEODORO, R.L.; CAMPOS, A. T. Efeitos do estresse térmico sobre a produção de bovinos. In:CONGRESSO NORDESTINO DE PRODUÇÃO ANIMAL, 2. Teresina, 2000. Anais... Teresina: SNPA, p.87-104, 2000.
THOM, E.C. The discomfort index. Weatherwise, Washington, v.12, p.57-59, 1959.
WAGNER-STORCH, A.M.; PALMER, R.W.; KAMMEL, D.W. Factors affecting stall usefor different freestall bases. Journal of Dairy Science, Savoy, IL, v.86, p.2253-2266, 2003.
WEST, J. W. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, Savoy, IL,v.86, p.2131-2144, 2003.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2014 Soraia V. Matarazzo, Iran J. O. Silva, Maurício Perissinoto, Sérgio A. Fernandes, Daniella J. Moura, Irineu Arcaro Júnior, Juliana R. P. Arcaro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.