Setting the farm animal welfare scene in North America


  • ANNA K. JOHNSON Assistant Professor Animal Behavior and Welfare. Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50021, USA.



Farm Animal, U.S.A., Welfare


The main areas of interest that this paper will address are to, set the scene on what animal welfare is, the schools that one can subscribe and how this could influence the direction that farm animal welfare could go. Second, to provide an overview on some of the critical farm animal welfare events that have occurred over the past 10 years in North America and finally to detail the legislative events; past and future that will affect farm animal welfare. Animal welfare is not a term that arose in science to express a scientific concept; rather it arose in western civilization through society to express ethical concern regarding the treatment of animals. There are three “schools of welfare”, the first school is feeling-based, the second is functioning-based and the third is nature-based. Over the past decade there has been an escalation of welfare related events in
North America, ranging from agribusiness and marketing through to humane and animal rights groups. These events include under cover investigations that have been conducted on farm and in plants. There have been numerous campaigns against fast food chain restaurants and more recently humane and rights groups have purchased shares into these companies to voice their opinions and to have a vote. In addition there has been a push for assuring on farm animal welfare
through a plethora of assessment, certification and third party auditing programs. More recently, successful legislative initiatives have altered the way producers are able to house farm animals in several states and in 2005 there was an update to the 28 hour rule. In conclusion, all individuals involved in keeping animals for food have a huge responsibility in making sure that their animals are housed, raised, transported and processed humanely. In addition agribusinesses will need to show increasing accountability back to their customers and consumers that farm animal welfare is of critical importance.


Download data is not yet available.


AMERICAN HUMAN ASSOCIATION. AHA. American Humane Certified®. 2008. Available at Accessed 10 june 2008.

AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE. AMI. 2008. Animal Handling and Audit Guidelines. Avail-able at: Accessed 10 june 2008.

ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE. AWI. 2008. Animal Welfare Approved. Available at: Accessed 06 june 2008.

BARNETT, J.L.; HEMSWORTH, P.H.; CRONIN, G.M.; NEWMAN, E.; MCCALLUM, T.H. Effects of design of individual cage-stalls on the be-havioural and physiological responses related to the welfare of pregnant pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science Amsterdam: North-Holland, v. 32, n. 1, p.23-33, 1991.

BRAMBELL, F. W. R. Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Ani-mals kept under Intensive. Livestock Husbandry Systems Majesty’s London.: Her Majesty’s Sta-tionery Office, 1965.

BROOM, D. M. Indicators of poor welfare. Brit-ish Veterinary Journal. London, UK v.142, p. 524-526, 1986.DUNCAN, I.J.H. Animal rights – animal wel-fare: a scientists assessment. Poultry Science, Sa-voy IL, v.60,n. 3, 489-499, 1981.

DUNCAN, I.J.H.; PETHERICK, J.C. The implica-tions of cognitive processes for animal welfare. Journal of Animal, Science,Savoy, Il, v,69, n. 12, 5017-5022, 1991.

DUNCAN, I.J.H.; DAWKINS, M.S. The problem of assessing “well-being” and “suffering” in farm animals. In: SMIDT, D (Ed.) Indicators relevant to farm animal welfare. Boston / Lancaster: Mar-tinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1983 p. 13-24.

FARM ANIMAL CARE TRAINING AND AU-DITING. Campinas: FACTA. 2008. Available at: Accessed 10 june 2008.

FOOD MARKETING INSTITUT- FMI. Arlington, VA : FMI Available at: Accessed 06 june 2008.

HUMANE FARM ANIMAL CARE. HFAC. Hern-don, VA: HFAC, 2008. Certified Humane Certi-fication Program. Available at: Accessed 10 june 2008.

HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES. HSUS. Washington, DC: HSUS, 2008a. Avail-able at: Accessed 06 june 2008.

HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES. HSUS. Washington, DC: HSUS, 2008b. Avail-able at: Accessed 06 June 2008.

JONES, D. Crimes without consequences: the enforcement of humane slaughter laws in the United States. Washington DC : Animal Wel-fare Institute, 2008. Available at: Accessed 10 june 2008.

MASON, J.; SINGER, P. Animal factories : what agribusiness is doing to the family farm, the en-vironment and our health. Out of print. NewYork: Crown, 1980.

MENCH J.A.; JAMES H.; PAJOR E.A.; THOMP-SON P.B. The welfare of animals in concentrated animal feeding operations. In: june 2008.

Report to the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production. Washington, DC. Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Produc-tion, 2008

MILK AND DAIRY BEEF. The Pennsylvania State University2008. Available at: Accessed 10 june 2008. MORMÈDE, P. Neuroendocrine responses to social stress. In: ZAYEN, R.; DANTZER, R, (Eds.) Social stress in domestic animals. Boston/London: kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, 1990, p. 203-211.

NATIONAL CATTLEMAN AND BEEF AS-SOCIATION - NCBA .Colorado: NCBA, 2008. Available at: Accessed 10 june 2008.

NATIONAL CHICKEN COUNCIL. NCC. Wash-ington, DC: NCC, 2008. Available at: Accessed 10 june 2008.

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CAIN RESTAU-RANTS. NCCR. Minneapolis, MN:The Pillsbury Company, 2008. Available at: Accessed 06 June 2008.

NATIONAL PORK BOARD. NPB. Des Moines, IA: Pork Board, 2008. PQA Plus. Available at: Accessed 10 june 2008. NATIONAL PORK BOARD. NPB. Des Moines, IA: Pork Board, 2008. Consumer eating trends. Meat consumption attitudes on pork. Available at:

NATIONAL TURKEY FEDERATION. NTF. Ani-mal Care Best Management Practices for the production of Turkey. New York: NTF, 2008. p.7 Available at: Accessed 10n June 2008.

PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS - PETA. Norfolk,VA : PETA, 2008a. Available at: Accessed 06 june 2008.PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT PETA, 2008b. Available at: Accessed 06 june 2008.


PEW COMMISSION ON INDUSTRIAL FARM ANIMAL PRODUCTION. Putting meat onthe table: industrial farm animal production in America. Washington, DC: PCIFAP 2008. Availableat: Accessed 06 June 2008.

PROFESSIONAL ANIMAL AUDITOR CERTIFI-CATION ORGANIZATION - PAACO. Redfield, IA: PAACO, 2008. Available at: Accessed 06 SINGER, P. Animal Liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. 2.ed. New York: Ran-dom House, 1990.

SMILHFIELD Foods Inc. Dublin, IE, jan, 2007.SWANSON, J.C. Bioethics - Livestock and poultry: the ethics of food animal production: processing, and marketing. The ethical aspects of regulating production. Poultry Science, Savoy, IL , v. 87, 373–379, 2008.

UNITED EGG PRODUCERS. UEP. Animal husbandry guidelines for US egg laying flocks.Washington, DC: UEP, 2008.Available at: Accessed 10 june 2008.

VALIDUSSERVICES.Animal welfare. Des Moines, Iowa: Validus, 2008. Available at: key-Page=8. Accessed 10 June 2008.

WARNIER, A.; ZAYAN, R. Effects of confine-ment upon behavioural, hormonal response and production indie in fattening pigs. In: ZAYAN, R (Ed.). Social space for domestic animals,Boston/London: kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, 1985, p.128-150.




How to Cite

JOHNSON, A. K. Setting the farm animal welfare scene in North America. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas, Tupã, São Paulo, Brazil, v. 2, n. 1, p. 57–69, 2008. DOI: 10.18011/bioeng2008v2n1p57-69. Disponível em: Acesso em: 21 jan. 2022.



Regular Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.