AGRO-SYSTEM (AGS) AS A TOOL FOR ANALYSIS, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY

Authors

  • Kassia WATANABE Pos-Doutoranda de Wageningen University/Universidade de São Paulo, bolsista WOTRO.
  • Decio ZYLBERSZTAJN Professor Titular do Departamento de Administração da FEA/USP.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2011v5n1p57-74

Keywords:

Agro-system, Sustainability, Institutional Arrangement

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present agro-system (AGS) as a tool for analysis, considering sustainability. This tool can be applied in different system, such as agri-food, bio-diesel system and among others. The question for this article is: How can sustainability be analyzed in AGS? AGS analysis is important, since it can point improvements or even introduce new institutional arrangement (organization forms). However, an institutional arrangement might not be good enough when transplanted to other place and local institutions should be considered. For this reason, the AGS is analyzed within institutional environment that involves the “rules of game”. Moreover, social and environment issues are concerned and are part of institutional arrangement and institutional environment as well. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARROW, K. (1969). The Organization of Economic Activity: Issue pertinent to the choice of market versus nonmarkets allocations. In: Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures.

Barzel, Y. 1997. Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

---. 2002. Organizational Forms and Measurement Costs. In ISNIE.

Bougherara, D., Grolleau, G. Mzoughi, N., (2005) How Can Transaction Cost Economics Help Regulators Choose Between Environmental Policy Instruments? Forthcoming in Research in Law and Economics.

Bortot, F. (2001) Global learning and local strategies: megatrends for a sustainable quality development. Agribusiness, Management e Ambiente, 13.

Brousseau, E. & E. Raynaud. 2006. The Economics of Private Institutions: An Introduction to the Dynamics of Institutional Frameworks and to the Analysis of Multilevel Multi-Type Governance. Acesso em: SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=920225

Chaddad, F. R. & M. L. Cook. 2002. An Ownership Rights Typology Of Cooperative Models. Working Papers.

Coase, R. H. (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, 19.

--- (1960) The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 23.

--- (1992) The Institutional Structure of Production. The American Economic Review, 82.

Davis, J. H. & R. A. Goldberg. 1957. A concept of agribusiness. 136. Boston: Harvard University.

Eggertsson, T. 1990. Economic Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Farina, E. M. M. Q. & D. Zylbersztajn. 1994. Competitividade e Organização das Cadeias Agro-Industriais. 63. Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Cooperação para a Agricultura.

---. 2003. Economics of networks and patterns of competition in food and agribusiness. In IV International Conference on Agri-Food Chain Management. Ribeirão Preto.

Goldberg, R. A. 1968. Agribusiness coordination: a systems approach to the wheat, soybean, and Florida orange economics. Boston: Havard University.

Goldberg, V. P. (1976a) Regulation and Administered Contracts. The Bell Journal of Economics,, 7, 23.

--- (1976b) Toward an Expanded Economic Theory of Contracts. Association for Evolutionary Economics, 10, 17.

Grandori, A. G. & G. Soda (1995) Interfirm networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, 16, 32.

Granovetter, M. (1985) Economic Action and Social Structure. The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91, 30.

Greif, A. 2005. Commitment, Coercion, and Markets: The Nature and Dynamics of Institutions Supporting Exchange. In Handbook of New Institutional Economics, eds. C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley, 60. Netherlands: Springer.

Gulati, R. & H. Singh (1998) The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 34.

Klein, B. 1992. Contracts and Incentives: the Role of Contract Terms in Assuring Performance. In Contract Economics, eds. L. Werin & H. Wijkander. Oxford, UK ; Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.

Klein, B., R. G. Crawford & A. A. Alchian (1978) Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process. Journal of Law & Economics, 21, 30.

Lazzarini, S. G., F. R. Chaddad & M. L. Cook. 2001. Integrating supply chain and network analyses: The study of netchains. Chain and network science.

Mamadouh, V., M. D. Jong & K. Lalenis. 2003. An Introdution to Institutional Transplantation. ed. -. Discussion Series Paper, 19.

Masten, S. E. 1998. Contractual Choice. 27. University of Michigan Law School.

Mazé, A. 2005. Contract law and the range of self-enforcing contracts in agriculture: private institutions and multilateral-reputation mechanisms. In Second French and German Talks in Law and Economics, 31. Sarrebrucken, Germany.

Mueller, B. & L. J. Alston. 2007. Legal Reserve Requirements In Brazilian Forests: Path Dependent Evolution Of De Facto Legislation. In ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pósgraduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics]. Anais do XXXV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 35th Brazilian Economics Meeting].

Ménard, C. (2004) The Economics of Hybrid Organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 32.

---. 2005. A New Institutional Approach to Organization. In Handbook of New Institutional Economics, eds. C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley, 281-318. Netherlands: Springer..

Neves, M. F. & L. e. T. Castro. 2008. A Method for Integrated and Sustainable Agribusiness Projects. In 18th Annual World Forum and Symposium – Meeting Food System Challenges Through Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16.

North, D. (1986) The New Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 8.

North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

--- (1991) Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 21.

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action : Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Revised edition ed.). Harvard University Press.

Ostrom, E. 2007. SUSTAINABLE SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS: AN IMPOSSIBILITY? In Annual Meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, “Science and Technology for Sustainable Well-Being,” 29. San Francisco.

Trienekens, J. H., A. J. M. Beulens & Van. 2000. Development of (re)design options in Supply Chain. In Chain Management in Agribusiness and the Food Industry, eds. J. H. Trienekens & P. J. P. Zuurbier. Wageningen: Wageningen Pers.

Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.

--- (1991) Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 28.

---. 1996. The Mechanism of Governance. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

--- (2003) Examining Economic Organization Through the Lens of Contract. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 26.

Zuurbier, P. & J. H. Trienekens. 2000. Introduction. In Chain Management in Agribusiness and the Food Industry, eds. J. H. Trienekens & P. Zuurbier. Wageningen: Wageningen Pers.

Zuurbier, P. J. J. & J. L. F. Hagelaar. 2000. On design governance structures for supply chains. In Chain Management in Agribusiness and the Food Industry, eds. J. H. Trienekens & P. Zuurbier, 455-465. Wageningen: Wageningen Pers.

Zylbersztajn, D. 1995. Estruturas de governança e coordenação do agribusiness. Uma aplicação da “Nova Economia das Instituições”. 238.

---. 2000. Conceitos gerais, evolução e apresentação do sistema agroindustrial. In Economia & Gestão dos Negócios Agroalimentares, eds. Zylbersztajn, D. Neves & M. Fava, 428. São Paulo: Pioneira.

--- (2005) Papel dos contratos na coordenação agro-industrial: um olhar além dos mercados. 43, 36.

Zylbersztajn, D. & E. M. M. Q. Farina (1999) Strictly Coordinated Food-Systems: Exploring The Limits Of The Coasian Firm. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2.

Published

2011-06-21

How to Cite

WATANABE, K.; ZYLBERSZTAJN, D. AGRO-SYSTEM (AGS) AS A TOOL FOR ANALYSIS, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas, Tupã, São Paulo, Brazil, v. 5, n. 1, p. 57–74, 2011. DOI: 10.18011/bioeng2011v5n1p57-74. Disponível em: https://seer.tupa.unesp.br/index.php/BIOENG/article/view/110. Acesso em: 20 oct. 2021.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.