WELFARE NORMS FOR SWINE PRODUCTION UNDER INTENSIVE REARING SYSTEM

Authors

  • RAQUEL B. T. R. DA SILVA FEAGRI/ UNICAMP- Campinas/SP.
  • IRENILZA A. NÄÄS FEAGRI/ UNICAMP- Campinas/SP.
  • DANIELLA J. MOURA FEAGRI/ UNICAMP- Campinas/SP.
  • NEIDIMILA A. SILVEIRA FEAGRI/ UNICAMP- Campinas/SP.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2007v1n2p137-145

Keywords:

animal production, animal welfare, norms and legislation

Abstract

Animal welfare is today one of the most important non-regulated commercial barrier inanimal protein international trade. The European Union along with the United States ofAmerica and Australia are important pork exporters. Rearing conditions vary betweencountries as it depends on the climate, as well as these animals transportation is alsodistinct worldwide. This research had the objective of describing a scenario related tolegal demands determined by the presence of adopted norms or legislations. For thisevaluation critical items were elected and score were given varying from 1 to 5 (very badto very good) as a function of the existence and the adoption of norms for each item.Average values were calculated and mean comparative analysis was applied in order toenhance the specific gaps. Results show that the countries in the European Union, theUnited States and Australia have already made and adopted their norms and laws thataim attending to certain welfare demands; while Brazil shows to be behind. Because ofthe new international animal welfare demands there is a need to update Brazilian legislation,as the country is an important pork exporter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALBRIGHT, L.D. Environmental Control forAnimals and Plants. St. Joseph, MI: ASAE.Textbook n.4, 1990. 455p.ANIMAL Welfare. Act 2002: new laws toprotect animals. Australia: Department ofLocal Government and RegionalDevelopment, 2002. p. 1-13.

BARNARD, C. Ethical regulation and animalscience: why animal behavior is special.Animal Behavior, Amsterdam, North-Holland, v. 74, jul, p. 5-13, 2007.

COCKRAM, Michael S. Criteria and potentialreasons for maximum journey times for farmanimals destined for slaughter. AppliedAnimal Behaviour Science, Amsterdam:North-Holland, v. 106, Sep., p.234-243,2007

COSSINS A.R., BOWLER, K. Temperaturebiology of animals. London: Chapman andHall, 987. 325p

EUREPGAP. THE GLOBAL PATNERSHIP ́FOR SAFE AND SUSTAINABLEAGRI-CULTURE. Disponível em http://www.eurepgap.org/Languages/English/index_html. Acesso em 30/11/05.FRASER, D. The vocalization and otherbehaviour of growing pigs in an ''open field''test. Applied Animal Ethology, AmsterdamNorth-Holland, v.1, p. 13–16, 1974.

GRANDIN, T. Assessment of stress duringhandling and transport, Journal of AnimalScience, Colorado State University n. 75,p. 249-257. 1997.

GRANDIN, T. Perspectives on transportationissues: The importance of having physicallyfit and cattle pigs. Department of animalsciences. Journal of Animal Science,Colorado State University, n.79, 7p. 2000.

GRANDIN, T. Review reducing handlingstress improves both productivity andwelfare. The Professional Animal Scientist,Fayetteville, v. 14, n. 1, mar. p. 10-11. 1998.

HOLDEN, J. P., GLONE, J. Animal WelfareIssues – Swine. Iowa State University,Department of Animal Sciences, 1997, p.4.

MANTEUFFEL, G.; PUPPE, B.; SCHON,P.C. Vocalization of farm animals as ameasure of welfare. Applied AnimalBehaviour Science, Amsterdam, v. 88, n. 1-2, p.163-182, 2004

MATTHEWS, L.R. Animal welfare andsustainability of production under extensiveconditions: a non-EU perspective. AppliedAnimal Behaviour Science, Amsterdam:North- Holland,v.49, p. 41-46, 1996.

MINITAB®:Minitab Statistical Software forWindows. São Paulo: Award Brasil, 2005.Disponível em http://www.minitab.com/products/minitab. Acesso em 10 de fevereirode 2007.

PASSILLÉ , A.M.; RUSHEN, J. Can wemeasure human–animal interactions in on-farm animal welfare assessment?: Someunresolved issues. Applied AnimalBehaviour Science, Amsterdam: North-Holland, v 92, aug, p. 193-209, 2005.

RINALDO, D; LE DIVIDICH, J. Influencie dela temperatura ambiente sur lesperformances de croissance du porc. In:INRA- Producción Animal, Paris, France,v.4, p. 57-65, 1991.

ROLLIN, B.E. Farm animal welfare: social,bioethical, and research issues. Ames: IowaState University, 1995. 168p.ROPPA, L. Perspectivas da produçãomundial de carnes, 2006 a 2030. In:CONGRESSO LATINO-AMERICANO DESUINOCULTURA, 3., 2006, Foz de Iguaçu.Anais... Campinas: Editora Animal/Word,2006. p.37-56.

SAMPAIO, C. A. P; NÄÄS, I.A. Gases eruídos em edificações para suínos-Aplicação das normas NR-15, CIGR eACGIH. Engenharia Agrícola, Jaboticabal,v. 25, n. 1, p. 10-18, 2005.

SCHRADER, L.; TODT, D.; Vocal quality iscorrelated with levels of stress hormones indomestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica).Ethology, Switzerland, IN, v. 104, p. 322-349,1998.

SOBESTIANSKY, J.; MARTINS, M.I.S.;BARCELLOS, D.E.S.H. de; SOBRAL,V.B.G.M. Formas anormais decompor-tamento dos suínos: possíveis causas ealternativas de controle. Concórdia.EMBRAPA-CNPSA. (Circular Técnica, 14).1991, 29 p.

TOLON, Y.B. de. Avaliação do ambientegerado pelo resfriamento adiabático emmaternidade de suínos e determinação demodelos de previsão de parâmetros deconforto. Campinas, 2002. Tese (Doutoradoem Engenharia Agrícola) – Faculdade deEngenharia Agrícola, Universidade Estadualde Campinas.

YEATES, J.W.; MAIN, D.C.J. Assessmentof positive welfare: A review. The VeterinaryJournal. UK. Disponível em:www.sciencedirect.com. Acesso em 18/09/07.

Published

2007-11-10

How to Cite

SILVA, R. B. T. R. D., NÄÄS, I. A., MOURA, D. J., & SILVEIRA, N. A. (2007). WELFARE NORMS FOR SWINE PRODUCTION UNDER INTENSIVE REARING SYSTEM. Revista Brasileira De Engenharia De Biossistemas, 1(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2007v1n2p137-145

Issue

Section

Regular Section