POWER-SAVING PROCEDURES AND ANIMAL THERMAL COMFORT AT A GROWING/FINISHING SWINE PRODUCTION UNIT

Authors

  • JULIANA SARUBBI MSc.Vet. Med. School of Agricultural Engineering, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Caixa Postal 6011 – CEP:13083- 875.
  • LUIZ ANTONIO ROSSI Ph.D. Electrical Engineer, UNICAMP, Campinas - Brazil
  • EVANDRO GOMES LARANJEIRA MSc. Systems analyst , UNICAMP, Campinas – Brazil
  • RAFAEL AUGUSTUS DE OLIVEIRA MSc. Agricultural Engineer , UNICAMP, Campinas - Brazil
  • NINA MIGLIORANZA VELLOSO MSc.Veterinarian, UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2008v2n2p185-192

Keywords:

Swine Production, Thermal Comfort, Energy Conservation and Rational Use

Abstract

Climate control systems are one alternative for minimizing losses due to high temperature and large thermal variations in swine production units. However, because of the possibility of increase the productions cost, the benefits of climate control systems should be assessed before they are
implemented. This research aims to assess the efficiency of different swine growing and finishing facilities regarding the animal thermal comfort, and the use of electric energy. The treatments are the following: S1 – two old automatic started fans + constructively inappropriate, S2 – two new
automatic started + constructively inappropriate fans, S3 – one old manual started fan + constructively inappropriate, S4 - no one acclimatization system + constructively appropriate. The variables used in comparing these constructions were dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, enthalpy and the thermal control index (ITH), as well as the electric variables and electric energy efficiency indexes. The use of two new fans and a sprayer system, both automatically started, provided animals with better thermal comfort, than compared wit h old ones. The use of automatic climate control equipment improves thermal comfort conditions as well as the use of electric energy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BUENO, L.G.F., ROSSI, L.A., Comparação entretecnologias de climatização para criação defrangos quanto a energia, ambiência eprodutividade, Revista Brasileira de EngenhariaAgrícola e Ambiental, 2006, v.10, n.2, p.497–504

CARVALHO, L.E. et al. Utilização daNebulização e Ventilação Forçada sobre oDesempenho e a Temperatura da Pele deSuínos na Fase de Terminação. RevistaBrasileira de Zootecnia, Viçosa, v.33, n.6,p.1486-1491, 2004.

FERREIRA, R.A. Efeitos do clima sobre anutrição de suínos. 2001. In: Encontros TécnicosABRAVES-SC, Concórdia. Memórias...Concórdia, SC: Embrapa Suínos e Aves, 2000.95p.HAEUSSERMANN A. et al. Cooling effects andevaporation characteristics of fogging systemsin an experimental piggery. BiosystemsEngineering, n. 97, 395 – 405. 2007.

MACDONALD, R. Saving Money by MaximizingEnergy Use Efficiency in Swine Production.Advances in Pork Production. 2002. v. 13, p.99.

MOURA, D.J. Ventilação na suinocultura. In:SILVA I.J.O. Ambiência e qualidade na produçãoindustrial de suínos. 1. ed. Piracicaba: FEALQ,1999. 149 - 179.

PERISSINOTTO, M. Avaliação da eficiênciaprodutiva e energética de sistemas declimatização em galpões tipo freestall paraconfinamento de gado leiteiro. 122f. Dissertação(Mestrado em Agronomia). ESALQ/USP,Piracicaba, 2002.

SARTOR, V. et al. Perfomance of an evaporativecooling system of a finishing phase swine barn,Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v. 60, n. 1, 2003.

SILVA I.J.O. Ambiência e qualidade na produçãoindustrial de suínos. 1. ed. Piracicaba: FEALQ,1999. 149 - 179.

SILVA, R.G. Introdução à Bioclimatologia Animal.São Paulo: Nobel, 2000. 286 p.THOM, E.C. The discomfort index.Weatherwise. v.12, n.1, p.57-60, 1959.

Downloads

Published

2008-11-12

How to Cite

SARUBBI, J., ROSSI, L. A., LARANJEIRA, E. G., DE OLIVEIRA, R. A., & VELLOSO, N. M. (2008). POWER-SAVING PROCEDURES AND ANIMAL THERMAL COMFORT AT A GROWING/FINISHING SWINE PRODUCTION UNIT. Revista Brasileira De Engenharia De Biossistemas, 2(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2008v2n2p185-192

Issue

Section

Regular Section