EVALUATING FARROWING REARING AMBIENT USING SOWS' VOCALIZATION

Authors

  • Yamilia Barrios TOLON
  • Marta dos Santos BARACHO
  • Irenilza de Alencar NÄÄS
  • Fabiana Ribeiro CALDARA
  • Rodrigo Garófallo GARCIA
  • Wagner T. SILVA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2013v7n3p124-133

Keywords:

swine production, sound signals, farrowing sows

Abstract

The analysis of sound signals is shown as a good indicator to estimate animals' welfare. The analysis of animal vocalization allows access to non-invasive estimation to the state and condition of the animals. This study aimed to assess the housing conditions of farrowing sows using the record of the sound environment where sows were housed. The analysis of the acoustic environment consisted of two parts the interpretation of the noise level and the understanding of the animals' vocalization and its association with stress. A software was developed in order to analyze the signals using neural networks. For the network training two sows in individual stalls and one sow in a group housing were randomly selected, and a microphone was connected to a computer to record and process the waveforms of the sounds emitted by the sow during lactation, and its corresponding spectrum frequency. From the results it was not possible to state that the rearing environment has caused significant changes in the frequencies of vocalizations of the animals. However, a slight tendency toward higher frequency peaks in the individual installation was found, indicating the presence of stress.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

HOPP, S.L.; OWREN, M.J.; C.S. EVANS. Animal Acoustic Communication: Sound Analysis and Research Methods. Springer, Heidelberg. 1997.

JAHNS, G. Understanding Animal Vocalization. Disponível em: http:// www.tb.fal.de/staff/jahns/animal.htm. Data de acesso 05//09/2009.

JENSEN, P.; ALGERS, B. An ethogram of piglet vocalizations during suckling. Appl. Animal Ethology, v.11, p.237–248, 1984.

KILEY, M., The vocalizations of ungulates, their causation and function. Z. Tierpsychol., v. 31, p. 171–222, 1972.

KLINGHOLZ, F, MEYNHARDT, H. Lautinventare der Saugetiere — diskret oder kontinuierlich, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, v. 50, n.. p. 250–264, 1979.

MANTEUFFEL, G., PUPPE, B., SCHÖN, P. C., 2004. Vocalization of farm animal as a measure of welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v. 88, p.163 – 182, 2004.

MANTEUFFEL, G.; SCHÖN, P. C. Measuring pig welfare by automatic monitoring of stress calls. Agrartechische Berichte, v. 29, p. 110 – 118, 2002.

MARX, G.; HORN, T.; THIELEBEIN, J.; KNUBEL, B.; VON BORELL, E. Analysis of pain-related vocalization in young pigs. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Amsterdam, v.266, n.3, p.687-698, 2003.

PUPPE, B., SCHÖN, P.C., TUCHSCHERER, A., MANTEUFFEL,G. Castration-induced vocalisation in domestic piglets, Sus scrofa: Complex and specific alterations of the vocal quality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.95, p.67-78. 2005.

SCHÖN, P.C., PUPPE, P., GROMYKO, T., MANTEUFFEL,G. Common features and individual differences in nurse grunting of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa): A multiparametric analysis. Behaviour, v.136, n.1, p.49-66. 1999.

WEARY, D. M.; APPLEBY, M. C.; FRASER, D. Responses of piglets to early separation from the sow. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.63, n.4, p.289-300, 1999.

WEARY, D. M.; ROSS, S.; FRASER, D. Vocalizations by isolated piglet: reliable indicator of piglet need directed towards the sow. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v. 53, p.249 – 257, 1997.

Published

2013-12-09

How to Cite

TOLON, Y. B., BARACHO, M. dos S., NÄÄS, I. de A., CALDARA, F. R., GARCIA, R. G., & SILVA, W. T. (2013). EVALUATING FARROWING REARING AMBIENT USING SOWS’ VOCALIZATION. Revista Brasileira De Engenharia De Biossistemas, 7(3), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2013v7n3p124-133

Issue

Section

Regular Section